Upon entering the Smart Homes and Digital Consumers seminar hosted by J.D. Power and Associates, I was greeted with the following quote from their president, Finbarr O'Neill:
Think about this for a moment. We are entering a phase where technology in the home allows a quadriplegic to control all aspects of their environment. You can set the thermostat, turn lights on and off, change the channel on the television and operate a satellite DVR all without raising a finger. Home security is tied into this as well. You may have seen advertisements made by Xfinity touting their new remote camera systems allowing you to view activity both in and around your home.
Eric Anderson said there are many connection issues, and stressed that all of this "stuff" needs to be personalized and customized to each individual. We've gone from the generation of those that say "I want my MTV" to a generation that demands "I want all of my things from home available to me on the go." An interesting observation, but I can't say that I'm surprised given the selfish demands of the "me" generation.
The Qualcomm representative had a bunch of statistics. One of them purported that a person looks at their phone 160 times in a day (on average once every six minutes). So for them, the discussion is about visual appeal, battery life, and the fact that the "World is flat" which is a line stolen from a best-selling book and illustrated by the fact that social networks were key in making the "Arab Spring" a reality.
All of the panelists agree on one thing. The need for Smart Home technologies is not just for the super rich. It is for everyone. Everyone will benefit from all of this and they want the companies to come together and create a standard so that everything will be compatible with everything else.
Then they started taking questions. Of course, you can count on me to bring up the uncomfortable question. And it did make the panelists jump a bit and caused the Qualcomm guy to utter, "I think I need to answer this question carefully."
There was a bit of "avoiding my question." It was their opinion that the only "regulation" that would need to take place revolves around privacy as they would be collecting massive amounts of information on consumers living in these homes in order to provide them with the best services. But other kinds of "regulation" might stifle innovation. Meh, that sounded a lot like a capitalist excuse.
Wednesday night, I attended the best show I've seen in Vegas yet. It's called Absinthe and it was at Caesar's Palace. It's in a very intimate setting and is for adults only. There's swearing, nudity, profanity, and audience members get randomly picked on by a foul-mouthed ring leader. But the Russian and Polish acrobats are not only gorgeous, but so close you can reach out and touch them. They even high five you during the show. Admittedly, I was in the front row.
This is a video someone uploaded on YouTube. I saw this from a few feet away in the front row. Crazy chair guy is so athletic, it's silly.
If you have the time, please go and visit Melissa's Imaginarium as she is kind enough to support me on my book tour today. You can find the link HERE.
"Consumer demand and expectations for digital lifestyle services continues to grow at a dramatic pace. The conveniences of monitoring and controlling more aspects of our lives through digital interface will change both engagement and dimensional aspects of the customer relationship."I can't say that I don't agree. There's a clear and pressing need for Smart Home technologies at all scales of income. The one that I am most familiar with has to do with differently-abled individuals who rely upon assistive technology in order to live somewhat independently of a caregiver. However, these individuals can ill-afford the price tags of many assistive technology devices.
Think about this for a moment. We are entering a phase where technology in the home allows a quadriplegic to control all aspects of their environment. You can set the thermostat, turn lights on and off, change the channel on the television and operate a satellite DVR all without raising a finger. Home security is tied into this as well. You may have seen advertisements made by Xfinity touting their new remote camera systems allowing you to view activity both in and around your home.
Eric Anderson said there are many connection issues, and stressed that all of this "stuff" needs to be personalized and customized to each individual. We've gone from the generation of those that say "I want my MTV" to a generation that demands "I want all of my things from home available to me on the go." An interesting observation, but I can't say that I'm surprised given the selfish demands of the "me" generation.
The Qualcomm representative had a bunch of statistics. One of them purported that a person looks at their phone 160 times in a day (on average once every six minutes). So for them, the discussion is about visual appeal, battery life, and the fact that the "World is flat" which is a line stolen from a best-selling book and illustrated by the fact that social networks were key in making the "Arab Spring" a reality.
All of the panelists agree on one thing. The need for Smart Home technologies is not just for the super rich. It is for everyone. Everyone will benefit from all of this and they want the companies to come together and create a standard so that everything will be compatible with everything else.
Then they started taking questions. Of course, you can count on me to bring up the uncomfortable question. And it did make the panelists jump a bit and caused the Qualcomm guy to utter, "I think I need to answer this question carefully."
There was a bit of "avoiding my question." It was their opinion that the only "regulation" that would need to take place revolves around privacy as they would be collecting massive amounts of information on consumers living in these homes in order to provide them with the best services. But other kinds of "regulation" might stifle innovation. Meh, that sounded a lot like a capitalist excuse.
Wednesday night, I attended the best show I've seen in Vegas yet. It's called Absinthe and it was at Caesar's Palace. It's in a very intimate setting and is for adults only. There's swearing, nudity, profanity, and audience members get randomly picked on by a foul-mouthed ring leader. But the Russian and Polish acrobats are not only gorgeous, but so close you can reach out and touch them. They even high five you during the show. Admittedly, I was in the front row.
If you have the time, please go and visit Melissa's Imaginarium as she is kind enough to support me on my book tour today. You can find the link HERE.
Already been to Melissa's.
ReplyDeleteI don't look at my cell phone that often. Oh wait, I don't own a cell phone...
too funny Alex, I think you and I must be the only 2 people left who don't have cell phones.
ReplyDeleteMichael, that show looks like a lot of fun - both the electronics and the Absinthe, altho I was hoping you were going to tell me you had some absinthe because I've been dying to know what it tastes like.
It's been a long time since I paid attention to CES
ReplyDeleteYou should have your "Meet the Press"-style talk show to make CEOs and politicians squirm.
ReplyDeleteIntelligent homes? All this time I've worried that most people were smarter than me and soon I'll be able to worry that houses are too?
ReplyDeleteWell, hopefully like everything else that gets mainstream adoption, the prices will drop as these things become more common.
ReplyDeleteMaybe one day I'll make it to Vegas, but I wouldn't hold my breath.
ReplyDeleteRock the hell on, Michael! Good on you for asking the hard questions! I wish I could've been there to see them hot shots SQUIRM!
ReplyDelete(I'm not too bloodthirsty, am I?)
Both of your topics are a little scary to me. While that type of technology is great if you need it, I find it pretty invasive. The Absinth show, would scare the crap out of me.
ReplyDeleteGlad you're enjoying Vegas, Micheal :)
ReplyDeleteI read something interesting about Smart Homes...maybe a year ago? It was about utilities and having all your utility usage completely transparent and instantly-accessable, so you could check your water and energy usage and adjust it from...well, anywhere. I think maybe that's only tangentially related to what you're talking about, though.
Why to be a raging liberal with that question. I'm surprised nobody accused you of being a socialist, LOL!
Very interesting. I'm glad to see you're having a great time.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with you on the technology thing. As a school teacher, I've seen more and more technology being used as the way to reach parents and enrich studies, but the neediest students often have the least access. It's frustrating.
ReplyDeleteLooks like a great show.
Well now, I have been meaning to get back to vegas...
ReplyDeleteWe got a new alarm system for the house and I was stunned at how much extra stuff it does. It's not 'smart home' level of stuff, but its still way more than I expected it to do.
ReplyDeleteThat was a smart question you asked regarding the regulation of prices for a technology the government will be buying. If the taxpayer is going to be picking up the tab, we should likely have an input on this.
ReplyDeleteI love that you ask the tough (and smart) questions!
ReplyDeleteAt dinner with my parents on wednesday i totally brought up the automated car info.
And also, that show sounds awesome.
Finally, i don't check my phone that often. BUT! I also don't have a smart phone so there is that