I think a Channing Tatum Gambit movie will be laughably bad.

I saw the Deadpool & Wolverine movie like much of America during its opening weekend. In it, we get to see a multiverse appearance of Channing Tatum playing Gambit from the X-Men. I honestly hated this. I realize that Tatum has wanted to play this character for a long time. It's been his dream even. But, I think he's a bad fit for the character. For one, the costume he wore made him look like his face was squished into Gambit's cowl. That...wasn't a good look. Channing Tatum is a bit too beefy for Gambit (personal take).

Additionally, his accent was terrible. I'm not sure if that was a joke in a movie that is full of jokes, but I've never had trouble understanding Gambit in the X-Men cartoons. But I had trouble understanding what Tatum was saying as he was playing the character. So, maybe Marvel in its cinematic universe is resetting to a goofy era as opposed to the era in which we got movies like Avengers: Infinity War and Avengers: Endgame. If this is true (I hope that it isn't), I question the choices that the executives at Marvel are making.

In X Men Origins: Wolverine we got a cool, suave, mysterious, powerful rogue who was holding his own against both Sabretooth and Logan. This is not what we got with Deadpool & Wolverine. Now, there is the argument online that Tatum was bad on purpose. But there are also a lot of fans out there who think that Tatum did a great job as a comic accurate Gambit, and they want this version of Gambit in the future. Hmmm. I'm not sold. However, there have been plenty of points made that Gambit is not meant to be taken seriously. I of course, disagree. I cannot imagine sitting through an entire movie based on a mumbling and almost incoherent hero.

I do wonder if Ryan Reynolds is baiting people like me by having this cameo in the movie. You see, Channing Tatum was going to star as Gambit but his movie got scrapped, and he's spent a decade or more basically trying to get it on track again. What I think Ryan Reynolds may be doing in Deadpool and Wolverine is showing us just how bad a Channing Tatum Gambit movie might actually be. So this cameo in the movie is an homage to Tatum's dedication while also making a joke of it because Reynolds is using the same cameo to show why a Channing Tatum Gambit film is going to be laughably bad.

Anyway, this post is mostly why I don't think Channing Tatum would make a good Gambit. Please, comic book nerds out there, weigh in on why I'm wrong or validate me if you so choose. I'm eager to read your thoughts on the matter.

Disney Studios does a great job in rotating major characters out of their Marvel properties. Black Widow is the latest example of this.

A bunch of people around the world watched Black Widow this past weekend. I was one of them. By the time it was over, I had thought yet again on why Marvel (when run by Disney) seems to keep hitting things out of the park. Every film has a freshness to it that you don't get with new Batman and Superman movies where they have recast the old character with whatever the new hotness is in Hollywood. It occurred to me that one of the things that Disney really has going for it is its willingness to just let things go and move on.

For example, Captain America, Iron Man, and Black Widow had run their course. So they let those characters go. There may be new ones that pop up in the future. Anthony Mackey is going to be a "Captain America." But he will never be "The Captain America," and I'm not bothered by that at all. That old "cap" is done as far as I'm concerned (and I really do love me some Chris Evans). The reel's been run out on that particular iteration of the character and what they wanted to do with their life. I gotta say though, that I'm a little in awe of Disney's bold moves to just toss aside old characters that have made them a ton of money. Lesser studios might have tried to woo the actor back with a salary increase or some other such nonsense, but not Disney.

Black Widow (of course) is the latest of the bunch that gets their swan song in a motion picture. When the character was first introduced, female members of "The Avengers" and female superheroes in general were kind of rare. However, we can't say that anymore (and it's only been ten or so years--that isn't that long, folks!). And as much as Natasha spent posing and doing the things that she does really well for the entirety of her run in the MCU, the film was also a highlight of Natasha's greatest hits, showing us one more time just why she was an Avenger in the first place (even though she had no actual super powers). The film also was an excellent springboard to introduce us to someone who is going to be "a Black Widow," even if she isn't the Black Widow. And that's actually exciting, because I love this new character (her name is Yelena Belova and is the younger sister of Natasha but not by blood). Progression and change is so much better than just rebooting characters and asking everyone to pretend that they don't know the origin story one more time.

In watching all of these comic book movies and television adaptations, I feel like studios (and Hollywood) too often keep reaching for the same bag of tricks to try and capture lightning in a bottle. The characters of Superman, the Batman, Spiderman, and the Joker have been done to death. As much as I love Tom Holland in the role of Spiderman, it's going to be fun to see what Disney does with the character next as Holland's contract is up. I read online that Holland is hoping that they will renew his contract, but I actually hope they don't. With the MCU providing a guiding hand to the property of Spiderman, I would assume that we are going to see an expansion of the character into the many alternate realms and earths, giving us all kinds of "Spider people." This hasn't ever been done before in live-action, and it's going to inject some badly needed freshness into a very stale franchise.

Change is a good thing. Capitalism doesn't agree with this statement of course. With regard to entertainment, what capitalism tends to do is to seize upon a successful thing...and then clone it with something that is only marginally different. The up and coming Windows 11 operating system reminds me of this, because Gizmodo's screen shots show that its interface will be almost identical to Mac OS. So, they are copying Apple to try and catch lightning in a bottle. Only Apple already caught the lightning in a bottle, so I don't think it will end up being any more successful than Windows 10 was (I'm actually a fan of Windows 10). And that's why what Disney does by tossing out these old characters in favor of trying out new ones is remarkable by any capitalist measuring stick.

Anyway, Black Widow was a great film that didn't feel stale, and it opened the doors to many other fun opportunities to explore within the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Anyone else see it this weekend? I'll look for your responses in the comments.