Pages

Wednesday, April 10, 2024

For a moment on The View Sunny Hostin was a perfect example of how conspiracy theories work in this country.

Sunny Hostin did something stupid on Monday. Sunny is a successful person, rich certainly by typical average American standards, and a co-host of The View. But on Monday, the talk show panelist suggested that the confluence of the solar eclipse, the New York City area earthquake, and the arrival of cicadas was due to climate change, or perhaps something biblical. She did get cut off by Joy Behar and Whoopi Goldberg who stepped in as real-time fact checkers. Here's the clip for you to watch, so you can see what I'm talking about.


So, here's my hot take about this: when people get wealthy and find success, they oftentimes are not self-aware about their own intelligence and wisdom. In our country (the United States) being rich and/or successful is seen as being smart. But there are tons and tons of people who have done well in this country who are not smart. And that is just a fact. You can be dumb as a rock but pretty/handsome and lucky and you will end up rich. But the "bootstrapper" mentality implies that you are smart and ready to observe the natural world and to participate in amateur science hour and look with your own eyes and explain how the universe works. Only...this is better left up to actual scientists who devote their lives and use instruments to measure and carefully validate with math and the scientific method and the known laws of physics to explain how things work. But the above clip is the perfect example of how conspiracy theories just run like wildfire in our country, and how snake oil continues to be sold by wealthy people who believe their own pseudo-science (Gwynneth Paltrow and Goop is just one example).

So why do people like Sunny Hostin feel that it is okay to share their completely bonkers thoughts based in pseudo-science? That question has an easy answer. It's because people think of themselves as smart because they were able to buy a house and go to college and get a degree as an attorney or some other thing. These accomplishments (that have nothing to do with science) become proof that their judgment is enough to explain the world. In other words, what they can see with their own eyes should be enough. So, some of these people start questioning the curvature of the Earth, and they make up dumb experiments to prove that the world is flat (even though we've known it is a sphere for hundreds of years) or some other nonsense. They take a look at snowbanks and say, "What global warming?" and then they laugh. They examine the tides and declare that "no one knows how that happens," and in fact we do know how it happens (having to deal with the rotation of the Earth and a bulge created by the moon's gravitational pull on the ocean). There really is an entire movement for people to take back science from actual scientists and to question things for which there is already an answer and where the science is settled (again flat-Earth believers).

We live in a strange world, because it is so easy to just write about things (my blog is included in this criticism I'm about to make). My dad and I once had a discussion. He said that having a computer in the house made him want to write something. Just having the device there seemed like an invitation for him to pour whatever thoughts he had rattling around in his head out onto a page so that others could read it. And he's absolutely correct on this. So, where conspiracy theories abound in this country, we can also draw a conclusion: that social media and technology making it so easy to publish things for others to read has certainly compounded the problem of pseudo-science.

As humans we make so many assumptions about others based on really shallow things. Is a person wealthy and seems to have their crap together in a way that we don't? Oh...well that person is smart then, and we should give them a platform upon which they can educate others. Only...this is really bad for everyone. What's another easy assumption? Beauty. Is a person pretty? Are they easy on the eyes? Oh! Well, they must be a moral and good person then. Nope...wrong again! Being pretty has nothing to do with a person's morality and whether they won't screw you over in the worst way possible or try to exploit you in some awful way. Is that person female? Oh, they must be compassionate because compassion is a female trait. Nope. This is erroneous thinking. Oh, is that person Hispanic? They will probably be okay with physical labor. Nope. This again is not the way we should be approaching any of these things. Anyway, I think I've made my point. But it doesn't change the fact that I think for a moment on The View (on Monday) Sunny Hostin became the perfect example of how conspiracy theories work in this country, and it seems to be an unsolvable problem. If only Gwynneth Paltrow's Goop provided self-awareness. Then it might actually be worth buying, because more and more people would keep the things they know nothing about under a lid and let true experts do the talking.

7 comments:

  1. I can't find the entry but I remember talking on my blog about celebrities whining about "free speech" on social media should remember that thousands (if not millions) of people follow them so what they say actually gets heard and believed. That means they need to be more responsible about what they say because people will listen and believe and pass it around. It's the same on live TV where you have thousands, if not millions watching. You really can't just say any stupid thing that pops into your head. Unfortunately on networks like Fox "News" they'll do that and no one will fact check it.

    I think one of the dumbest conspiracy theories I've heard besides "flat Earth" are "chemtrails." I'm not a scientist, but the science on this seems pretty obvious. At higher altitudes the sky is cold. Meanwhile, jet engines are hot. Hence you get contrails, not because the gubbmint is spraying chemicals or whatever nonsense.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @P.T.: I watched an entire short video made by a guy that wanted to understand why Flat-Earthers believe what they do. He discovered that (for one) they conduct their own experiments. One of them was to take an actual hardware store level and put it on the tray in front of them in a flight across the country and see if the bubble stayed in the middle (even though if you look out the window you can tell that the Earth is curved because you are so high up). Their reasoning was that if the Earth was curved then the bubble would shift from the middle. Another dumb experiment was to find a really long canal and watch to see if someone on a boat dipped below the horizon. But they didn't account for light refraction through the atmosphere, etc. It's all just really dumb, but these people think they are being smart.

      Delete
  2. The Internet in general has provided everyone the opportunity to spout whatever they want, true or not.
    I thought that moment was hilarious.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dunning-Kruger, in effect.

    Did you see that doc on Netflix (I think it was Netflix) where the flat Earthers did all these experiments to prove the Earth flat? Oh, that was fascinating. They actually proved the Earth was spherical, but they wouldn't accept that result, so they were redoing the experiment because "influences" or something and they had to correct for them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. There were several ridiculous statements about the eclipse broadcast by famous people with a microphone.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The US is nearly built on stereotypes and pseudo science. Too many people try to be an expert in things they're not. That's why when we research on internet we really have to verify our sources and who composed them because there are a lot of people out there who try to come off as experts by using the internet's tools.

    ReplyDelete